The best evidence
that Bigfoot existence I have seen are the foot print
castings and the analysis of the Patterson Gimlin film. There has been
DNA evidence and hair samples analyzed that have shown positive
for an unknown primate.
Roger Patterson filmed a video of a
Bigfoot in 1967 in Bluff Creek, California. He
was accompanied by Bob Gimlin on horse back.
The Patterson Gimlin film has been analyzed by many experts and has withstood much scrutiny. I have seen several university analysis of the film and each on has come to the same conclusion, the video is not a fake. One analysis conducted by Dr. Andrew Nelson, of Idaho State University looked at the biomechanics of the creature in the video. It showed the skeletal movement of the subject and the way it walked with it's hip and leg movements were much different than a human being. Dr. Nelson also noted soft tissue from a bulge in one leg, that was from muscle tendons, not a costume. Another video analysis of the film could detect muscles in the face moving.
The Patterson Gimlin film has been analyzed by many experts and has withstood much scrutiny. I have seen several university analysis of the film and each on has come to the same conclusion, the video is not a fake. One analysis conducted by Dr. Andrew Nelson, of Idaho State University looked at the biomechanics of the creature in the video. It showed the skeletal movement of the subject and the way it walked with it's hip and leg movements were much different than a human being. Dr. Nelson also noted soft tissue from a bulge in one leg, that was from muscle tendons, not a costume. Another video analysis of the film could detect muscles in the face moving.
There is also a Bigfoot tooth in the possession of Mike Rugg, curator of the Bigfoot Discovery Museum in Felton, California. He has been trying to get it DNA tested for a few years.
Hair samples of Bigfoot have been shown to be nearly identical to humans, but have never been cut, like a wild man who has lived in the woods all his life.
Tom Slick led several expeditions to the
Himalayas in the late 1950s He found
droppings that were analyzed in the east and found to have parasites of an unknown primate.
The late Dr. Grover Krantz was an anthropologist at Washington University. He analyzed a foot print that exhibited a broken bone of a crippled Sasquatch. Dr Krantz and other scientists believe this print is real and would have been nearly impossible to fake.
Dr. Meldrum has some casts that show dermal ridges, which exist in human prints. But Bigfoot ridges run in a different direction, showing these are not human prints. But also extremely difficult to fake.
And probably the most convincing piece of evidence I have seen regarding foot prints was a graph done by Henry Fahrenbach at the Oregon Regional Primate Center. He plotted a large number of Bigfoot tracks taken from all over the country of different sizes and ages of Bigfoot. When they plot a graph of know animals like bears, dear and people, plot the length verses width of different ages, the plot always comes out as a bell shape. This is something that happens in nature as animals grow. When Farenbach plotted the many Bigfoot tracks, length verses width, it came out in a bell shape, just like any other living animal. Meaning the tracks could not have been faked, but were from a real living creature.
If this were in a court of law and I was
on the jury, with the previous evidence
presented, I would have to vote guilty as charged, they really do exist. So you see, there is plenty of evidence
that supports the existence of Bigfoot. You just
have to know where to look.
References:
Information
obtained from Wikipedia.org,
under the Creative Commons
Attribution, Sharealike license.
Wikipedia.org articles; Bigfoot,
Patterson-Gimlin film, Grover Krantz,
Jeffrey Meldrum.
Websites; Sasquatchgenomeproject.org.
SasquatchCanada.com; The Fahrenbauch
Findings,
BigfootDiscoveryProject.com
Television; “Monsterquest”, “Bigfoot”.
"Finding Bigfoot", "Birth of a Legend", 2011.
No comments:
Post a Comment